Crest Capital mark
Crest Capital
Beyond the asset.
Back to Journal
Journal / Tax and structure

1031 exchanges inside a trust: what actually changes

Where the mechanics of an exchange get more complicated once a trustee, rather than an individual, is executing it.

By Zied Bejaui · Crest Capital · October 14, 2026

A trustee sells an investment property and considers acquiring another. The objective may be sensible: replace a demanding building, improve income, reduce concentration, or move capital into a market that better serves the portfolio.

A Section 1031 exchange may allow qualifying gain to be deferred. Trust ownership adds questions that need to be resolved before the transaction begins.

Who is the taxpayer? Who can authorize the exchange? Does the trust need to retain the proceeds for investment, or make them available to beneficiaries? How will ownership and reporting be handled after closing?

Those questions matter across California, Washington, and Texas, the three states in which Crest Capital is licensed. The federal exchange framework is shared. Trustee authority and state obligations require their own review.

The first question is whether the property and proposed transaction qualify.

The IRS limits Section 1031 treatment to qualifying exchanges of real property held for business or investment. Property held primarily for sale is excluded. Placing a property in a trust does not establish its qualifying use. A family home, a rental building, and property being developed for sale require different analysis.[1]

The next question is who owns the property for federal income tax purposes.

The name on the deed is part of that review. The tax classification of the trust is another.

IRS instructions explain that a grantor trust, or its grantor portion, is generally disregarded for income tax purposes, with the relevant income and deductions attributed to the grantor or other deemed owner. A nongrantor trust is generally a separate taxpayer. Trust classification therefore needs to be confirmed before deciding how the relinquished and replacement properties will be held and reported.[2]

A trustee should have the CPA and tax counsel reconcile the deed, trust provisions, tax ownership, and any entity structure involved. If the trust owns an interest in an entity that owns the building, the review must also establish which taxpayer is exchanging which asset.

A proposed distribution to beneficiaries, division into separate trusts, or change in ownership around the exchange needs advance analysis. The practical question is whether the transaction preserves the tax ownership and investment-use requirements on which qualification depends.

Authority also needs to be settled before a closing date is committed.

The trust instrument and applicable law need to be reviewed for powers to sell, acquire, borrow, and reinvest, together with any restrictions or approval requirements. Counsel should establish which trustees must participate and whether another person or court has a role.

The exchange documents, purchase agreement, financing, and title instructions should reflect that confirmed authority. A tax strategy needs an authorized person capable of carrying it through.

Timing becomes especially important when several people are involved.

For a standard deferred exchange, replacement property must be identified within 45 days after transferring the relinquished property, through written identification meeting IRS requirements unless an applicable exception is satisfied. Replacement property must be received by the earlier of 180 days after that transfer or the applicable tax-return due date, including extensions. The identification and acquisition periods run from the original transfer; the 180-day period includes the first 45 days.[3]

Those deadlines need to be incorporated into the trustee’s approval process, property search, financing, and due diligence. Any applicable IRS relief should be confirmed rather than assumed.

Control of the sale proceeds also requires advance arrangements.

IRS Publication 544 explains actual and constructive receipt and the qualified-intermediary safe harbor. The ability to receive or control proceeds can affect the exchange’s tax treatment. A trustee pursuing that structure should have the intermediary and advisors establish the exchange agreement, restrictions on proceeds, and closing instructions before the relinquished property closes.[4]

The trust’s ordinary cash-management process needs to accommodate those restrictions.

That leads to a question the family may not have addressed: how much cash does the trust need to keep available?

An exchange can retain capital in investment property while the trust has distribution obligations, expenses, or other liquidity needs. The trustee should compare a full exchange, a partially taxable exchange where appropriate, and a taxable sale against those requirements.

Cash received and relief from debt can produce recognized gain, depending on the other amounts involved. The CPA should model the actual transaction, including proceeds, liabilities, additional cash, and exchange expenses. The replacement property’s tax basis also needs to be calculated and preserved in the records.[4]

A proposed exchange involving family members or affiliated entities deserves additional review. IRS instructions identify special rules for both direct and indirect related-party exchanges. Using an intermediary does not remove those rules. The parties, ownership relationships, transaction sequence, and any later disposition plans need to be examined before the structure is adopted.[3]

State obligations continue alongside the federal analysis.

California requires Form FTB 3840 when California property is exchanged for out-of-state replacement property and California-source gain or loss remains deferred. Filing generally continues annually until that deferred amount is recognized, including where the taxpayer otherwise has no California return requirement.[5]

For an illustrative trustee exchanging a California rental for Texas investment property, the closing may create an ongoing California reporting responsibility. The records should identify who will maintain the deferred-gain schedule and make the annual filings, including after a change of trustee.

Washington has a different issue to examine. Its rules expressly apply real estate excise tax to certain acquisitions by exchange facilitators and set conditions for exempting subsequent facilitator transfers. Federal exchange treatment therefore should not be treated as a blanket exemption from Washington transfer taxes.[6]

A transaction spanning California, Washington, or Texas needs a closing and reporting plan that accounts for the relevant properties, ownership structure, and taxpayer.

There is also a distinction worth making when a replacement proposal uses the word “trust.”

A Delaware statutory trust offered as a real estate investment is a different structure from the family’s estate-planning trust. In Revenue Ruling 2004-86, the IRS concluded that an interest in the particular DST described could qualify in a Section 1031 exchange if the other requirements were met. That conclusion depends on the structure and facts; it does not establish that every trust investment qualifies.[7]

Eligibility is one part of evaluating such a proposal. The trustee still needs to examine the underlying property, financing, fees, distributions, management, and ability to exit.

Before proceeding, the advisory team should be able to explain the taxpayer’s identity, trustee authority, qualifying use, deadlines, handling of proceeds, financing, beneficiary liquidity, and continuing reporting obligations.

The decision record should also explain why the replacement investment serves the trust.

At Crest Capital, an exchange is evaluated within the larger property and portfolio decision. Deferral has value when the replacement asset and the commitments required to acquire it fit the account’s objectives.

The trustee’s responsibility continues in the property acquired and the obligations carried forward.

Sources

  1. Internal Revenue Service. “Like-Kind Exchanges, Real Estate Tax Tips.” https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/like-kind-exchanges-real-estate-tax-tips
  2. Internal Revenue Service. Instructions for Form 1041 and Schedules A, B, G, J, and K-1 (2025). https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i1041
  3. Internal Revenue Service. Instructions for Form 8824 (2025). https://www.irs.gov/instructions/i8824
  4. Internal Revenue Service. Publication 544 (2025), Sales and Other Dispositions of Assets. https://www.irs.gov/publications/p544
  5. California Franchise Tax Board. “Reporting like-kind exchanges.” https://www.ftb.ca.gov/file/personal/reporting-like-kind-exchanges.html
  6. Washington State Department of Revenue. WAC 458-61A-213, IRS “tax deferred” exchange. https://app.leg.wa.gov/WAC/default.aspx?cite=458-61A-213
  7. Internal Revenue Service. Revenue Ruling 2004-86. https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/rr-04-86.pdf
The California to Texas exchange scenario is illustrative. Tax rules change and depend on specific facts, so confirm current requirements with qualified advisors. Interpretations and suggested review questions are Crest Capital's analytical perspective.
This article provides general information. Exchange eligibility, tax ownership, trustee authority, state obligations, and transaction structure require review with qualified tax and trust counsel, the CPA, and the exchange intermediary before closing.